Thoughts of a project manager about "Risk Management for Businesses and Projects: Why it is an Art? "

Consciously or sub-consciously, risk management is part of our DNA. Take crossing the street, for example. Before you pass, you pause. You look in front of you, turn your head left and right. If there are no obstructions, then you cross; else, you calibrate your plan of action
Thoughts on risk management - and how to identify positive and negative risks.
Thoughts on risk management - and how to identify positive and negative risks.
It is much like the same for businesses that are either trying to pursue an opportunity (a positive risk) or trying to address a present or prospective threat (a negative risk). They have to act (i.e., to cross the street) to address the current threats and opportunities (collectively as risks) because inaction would be catastrophic. I wish, though, that pursuing a business, or a project objective is as easy as crossing a street. Unfortunately, it is more complicated than that.

Foremost, businesses must navigate a complex web of external and internal factors to achieve the desired results. These factors often include political, economic, social, technology, environment, and legal aspects. In the business and project management domains, these factors are commonly referred to as PESTEL, which is part of the analysis stage. Often, they are viewed as external factors. However, I tend to differ in this thinking. In recognizing the internal factors of a business or a project, the use of PESTEL in analyzing also applies.
A good example is the political dimension. Businesses and projects alike constitute different stakeholders, with each having different interests. They also have different interpretations of how those objectives could be attained due to inherent cognitive biases. Hence, in any project, the use of Stakeholder Analysis and the development of the Stakeholder Engagement Plan, side by side with the PESTEL Framework, are essential. We, humans, are a complex animal to navigate that each of us has different intentions and motivations. We tend not to support or engage if our interests are not taken into consideration. Another complication is the behavior aspect that can be couched in the social element. Not all humans are receptive to change, as we all know. Some, if not most, prefer the status quo for varied reasons (e.g. traditions, no interest in learning new things, loss of control).

The use of risk management in the pursuit of business or project objectives, thus, cannot be understated. Thankfully, there is plenty of literature, guidance, and standards to use. Notable, among those, is the ISO31000 – Risk Management. However, one has to be careful in adopting a rigid risk management framework. Like living, risk management is also an art.
About the author: Antonio Magallanes-Villamor, Jr., CFE (ACFE), CRMA (The IIA), GRCP (OCEG), CBDA (IIBA), is Senior Official for Cairo, Egypt, and Manila, Philippines. He works currently as the Head of the Internal Audit Unit of the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) and Bioversity International, which are both member centers of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).

Keywords: Risk management, Tip, Psychology

The IAPM certification

The certification can be taken via a reputable online examination procedure. The costs are based on the gross domestic product of your country of origin.


Which certification suits you best?

For better readability, we usually only use the generic masculine form in our texts. Nevertheless, the expressions refer to members of all genders.

From the IAPM Blog

IAPM newsletter

Receive valuable content on the topics of project management, certification and IAPM directly in your mailbox. Our newsletter is free of charge.